Educational foundations in the implementation of the merdeka curriculum: A philosophical, sociological, and psychological review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v16i3.7014Kata Kunci:
Education Policy, Educational Foundations, Merdeka Curriculum, Student-Centered LearningAbstrak
Background: The implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum requires a strong conceptual understanding to ensure that curriculum reform goes beyond administrative changes and reflects meaningful educational goals. Educational foundations play a crucial role in guiding curriculum policy formulation and implementation. Purpose: This article aims to analyze the role of philosophical, sociological, and psychological educational foundations in the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. Method: This study employed a qualitative approach using a literature review method. Data were collected from books, reputable national and international journal articles, and relevant educational policy documents. The data were analyzed thematically to identify the interconnections among educational foundations. Results: The findings indicate that philosophical foundations provide value orientation and educational goals through an emphasis on student-centered learning and character development. Sociological foundations ensure curriculum relevance to social, cultural, and community needs through flexibility and contextual learning. Psychological foundations support learning practices that consider students’ development, interests, and individual differences through differentiated instruction and formative assessment. Conclusion: The integration of philosophical, sociological, and psychological foundations is a critical prerequisite for ensuring that the Merdeka Curriculum is implemented consistently, contextually, and meaningfully, thereby supporting student-centered learning.
Referensi
Apple, M. W. (2020). Ideology and curriculum (4th ed.). Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
Biesta, G., & Priestley, M. (2022). Curriculum making in times of uncertainty. Curriculum Journal, 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.142
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining deeper learning and 21st century skills. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.6691
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2020). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Educational Leadership, 77(6), 58–64.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Educational Research, 65(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2153934
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
Noddings, N. (2021). Philosophy of education in a new key. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1838275
Nugroho, A. (2023). Psychological foundations of student-centered learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(2), 89–104.
OECD. (2021). Curriculum (re)design: A series of thematic reports from the OECD Education 2030 project. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ebe7a0b5-en
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2021a). Teacher agency and curriculum making in times of educational change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(6), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1854023
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2021b). Teacher agency and curriculum reform. The Curriculum Journal, 32(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.93
Rahmawati, R., & Hidayat, T. (2022). Sociological perspectives on curriculum reform in Indonesian education. Cendekia: Journal of Education and Society, 20(2), 145–158.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Does the pandemic help us make education more equitable? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09284-4
Schleicher, A. (2021). The state of global education: One year into the COVID pandemic. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09284-1
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryadi, A. (2021). Philosophy of education and curriculum development. Journal of Educational Thought, 54(1), 1–15.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). So each may soar: The principles and practices of learner-centered classrooms. ASCD.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Zhao, Y. (2020). Learners without borders: Reimagining education for a global age. Corwin Press.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Ahmad Nurhadi, Asep Agus Salim, Desi Ferawati, Elim Halimah Sadiyah, Noni Nurasiah, Rista Maifi, RR. Andriani Sariwardani
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
