Main Article Content

Siska Handayani
Muhammad Nur Iqbal

Abstract

The All You Can Eat (AYCE) dining system, which allows consumers to consume unlimited food for a fixed price, has become increasingly popular in modern culinary businesses. However, this system has generated debate from the perspective of Islamic economic law, particularly concerning issues of contractual clarity (ta?y?n), uncertainty (gharar), and fairness between sellers and consumers. This study examines the AYCE system from two legal perspectives: Indonesian Consumer Protection Law, specifically Law No. 8 of 1999, and the Islamic jurisprudential perspective of the Sh?fi?? school. The objective of this research is to analyze the conformity of AYCE practices with consumer protection principles and the requirements of a valid sale contract according to the Sh?fi?? madhhab. This study employs a normative-empirical research method with a conceptual approach, analyzing legal texts, fiqh doctrines, and empirical practices in AYCE businesses. The findings indicate that, from the perspective of positive law, the AYCE system is legally permissible provided that consumers receive clear, accurate, and non-misleading information, and that no element of coercion is present. From the Sh?fi?? perspective, the validity of the transaction depends on mutual consent (tar???) and transparency between the seller and buyer. Although the AYCE system contains elements of ambiguity in terms of portion size, consumption time limits, and the imposition of fines, such ambiguities are tolerated as long as they do not result in harm (?arar) or injustice to either party. This study contributes to contemporary Islamic economic discourse by providing a legal and jurisprudential framework for understanding modern consumption systems and serves as a reference for Muslim business practitioners and academics in aligning commercial practices with both consumer protection law and Sharia principles.

Article Details

How to Cite
Handayani, S. ., & Iqbal, M. N. . (2026). The implementation of the sale and purchase agreement in the all-you-can-eat system: A study of consumer protection law no. 8 of 1999 and the perspective of the shafi’i school. Journal of Law Science, 8(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v8i1.6337
References
Abdul, A. R., Mandiri, D. P., Astuti, W., & Arkoyah, S. (2022). Tantangan Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 5(2), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.25299/jtb.2022.vol5(2).9505
Afifah, N. (2019). ANALISIS HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP JUAL BELI terpancar dari padanya . Jual beli merupakan sesuatu yang ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? yang sepadan dan melalui cara tertentu . Jual beli telah. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam, 09(01), 137.
Al-Farr??, A. bin M. (2008). Tafsir Imam Syafi’i. Jakarta: Penerbit Almahira.
Alexander, O., Fauzi, M., Yani, A., & Siswoyo, S. (2023). Konsep Rahn (Gadai) Dalam Islam Dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Kajian Fikih Muamalah. Hutanasyah?: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v2i1.639
All, K., & Can, Y. (2021). Review of Islamic Law Towards the Implementation of Buying and Selling Food With the Concept of All You Can Eat ( Study of Two. Syarikah, 7(2), 96–103.
Ariany, F., Aminullah, A., & Fitriatun, E. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online Facebook Di Kota Mataram. JIHAD?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 4(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v4i2.4403
Az-Zuhailliy, W. (2021). Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Az-Zuhailliy, W. (2022). Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu Beirut: Dar- Alfikr.
Farid, M., Badri, M. A., & Nirwana, A. (2023). Aqad Salam Haal Dalam Perspektif Madzhab Syafi’i dan Penerapannya Dalam Aqad – Aqad Jual Beli Kontemporer. Al-Kharaj?: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(6), 3148–3154. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i6.3041
Iqbal, M. N., Arfa, F. A., & Waqqosh, A. (2023). Tujuan Hukum Islam Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 4887–4895.
Khatimah, H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online Di Aplikasi Lazada Dan Shopee. Lex LATA, 4(3), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v4i3.1757
Midhia, F. G. (2022). Jual Beli Dengan Konsep All You Can Eat Dalam Perspektif Fiqih Muamalah. Mu’amalah?: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.32332/muamalah.v1i2.5000
Muthiah, A. (2018). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Cacat Dalam Perspektif Fiqih Jual Beli. Syariah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 18(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i2.2286
Nasution, L. M. (2019). Hak Khiyar Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Menurut Mazhab Syafi’i Dan Hukum Positif. Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah, 13(1), 64. Retrieved from http://jurnal.staiserdanglubukpakam.ac.id/index.php/alfikru/article/view/28
Nubahai, L. (2023). Implementasi dan Eksistensi Khiyar (Studi Transaksi Jual Beli melalui Marketplace). TAWAZUN?: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 6(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v6i1.22245
Nurjannah, N., Fadel, M., & Jaki Asti, M. J. A. (2023). Eksistensi Hak Khiyar Pada Jual Beli Sebagai Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Islam. Jurnal Al-Kharaj: Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Muamalah, Dan Hukum Ekonomi, 3(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.30863/alkharaj.v3i1.4238
Pekerti, R. D., Faridah, E., Hikmatyar, M., & Rudiana, I. F. (2021). Implementasi Akad Istishna (PSAK Syariah 104) dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online. AKTSAR: Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v4i1.8562
Pramono, S. B., & Kurniati, G. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Barang Online di Indonesia. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 1(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v1i2.1037
Ranto, R. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Melalui Media Elektronik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 2(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol2.no2.p145-164
Rukminingsih. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif.
Salam, A. F. A. (2019). Peran Lpksm Al-Jabbar Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jaminan Fidusia Di Kabupaten Sumedang. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 12(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v12i2.4493
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (cetakan ke). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susila, G. N. A. D. (2017). Peranan Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Penjualan Obat-Obatan Melalui Internet. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4(3), 1–6. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/71155
Syazali, H. (2021). Teori Tentang Akad. In Fiqih Muamalah Kontemporer (Vol. 1).
Undang-, Y. A. R. D. (2024). TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE DALAM PERSPEKTIF SYEKH. 2(2), 74–85.
Yusriadi. (2022). Bank syariah dan konvensional ( Suatu Analisis Perbedaan dan Prinsip-priYusriadi. (2022). Bank syariah dan konvensional ( Suatu Analisis Perbedaan dan Prinsip-prinsipnya ). Syarah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Ekonomi, 11(1), 1–15. https://journal.iainlhokseumaw. Syarah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Ekonomi, 11(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://journal.iainlhokseumawe.ac.id/index.php/syarah/article/view/293/274