Coalition and opposition in the perspective of Indonesian constitution
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines the coalition and opposition in the Indonesian constitutional system based on the 1945 Constitution and how political dynamics between them affect executive legislative supervision. In Indonesia's multi-party presidential system, a dominating coalition and a weak opposition make checks and balances difficult. This study combines a normative legal research technique using a normative descriptive approach to map the coalition and opposition and a juridical-analytical approach to examine legislative oversight's legal and practical restrictions. Along with scientific research and comparisons of political systems in other nations, the 1945 Constitution, associated statutes and regulations, and Constitutional Court rulings are employed. The research found that although the 1945 Constitution does not directly govern the coalition and opposition, political practices in Indonesia reveal that the coalition dominates and the opposition is divided and ineffective. The inadequate parliamentary monitoring of executive policies, which are typically formality, is affected. To ameliorate this political dynamic, legal change to formalize opposition regulation, legislative capability, and electoral system simplification are recommended. The research concludes that political and legal change is needed to guarantee Indonesian democracy upholds people's sovereignty and government accountability.
Article Details
Abqa, M. A. R., Junaidi, Hutabarat, S. A., Suhariyanto, D., Fauziah, N. M., Khilmi, E. F., Meliana, Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). HUKUM TATA NEGARA: Sebuah Konsep Dasar dalam Menata Bangsa. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Adhayanto, O. (2015). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara Dalam Pembentukkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 166–174.
Ahmad, A., & Nggilu, N. M. (2019a). Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1646
Ahmad, A., & Nggilu, N. M. (2019b). UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution The Pulse of the Fifth Amendment. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(4), 786.
Amer, N., Lubis, A. F., Muhtar, M. H., Saija, V. J. E., Putri, V. S., & Setiawan, B. (2024). IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR POLITICAL NEUTRALITY IN THE DYNAMICS OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY. Journal de Facto, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldefacto.v10i2.189
Diharjo, N. N., Muhtar, M. H., Rahim, E. I., Rachman, S. N., Saija, V. J. E., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Human Rights and Constitutional Sovereignty in The Context of The Struggle for Legal Justice. Bacarita Law Journal, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v4i2.12985
Dungga, W. A., & Muhtar, M. H. (2022). The Concept And Position Of The Formulation Of The Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 11 Of 2020 Concerning Job Creation Was Prepared Using The Omnibus Law Technique. Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i2.589
Hakim, L., & Kurniawan, N. (2021). Membangun Paradigma Hukum HAM Indonesia Berbasis Kewajiban Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1847
Harahap, T. K., Prayuti, Y., Latianingsih, N., Damanik, A., Maheni, T., Farida, I., Muhtar, M. H., & Mustaqim. (2023). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. Penerbit Tahta Media. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/255
Hidayat, K., & Azra, A. (2012). Pancasila Demokrasi, HAM, dan Masyarakat Madani. Kencana.
Indra, M., Saragih, G. M., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia: Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 279–299.
Mahkamah Konstitusi, & Universitas Jember. (2019). Peran Progresif Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Melindungi Hak Pilih Disabilitas Kategori Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Peningkatan Partisipasi Pemilih dalam Pemilu. Peran Progresif Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Melindungi Hak Pilih Disabilitas Kategori Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Peningkatan Partisipasi Pemilih dalam Pemilu.
Manan, B., Mashudi, & Magnar, K. (1995). Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Konstitusi Suatu Negara. Mandar Maju.
Mangesti, Y. A., Ahmad, A., Muhtar, M. H., Ginting, G., & Sacipto, R. (2024). Term Limitation of Indonesian Parliamentarians Seen from Constitutionalism. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 11, e263. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v11i2.91104
Maulidi, M. A. (2019). Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Questioning the Executorial Force on Final and Binding Decision of. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627.
Media, K. C. (2020, January 22). Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia. KOMPAS.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu-2019-sebanyak-894-petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia
Muhtar, M. H., Khasanah, D. D., Anita, A. A., Abas, M., Bagus, M., Cahyandari, D., Setiawan, E. B., Jenar, S., Putri, F. A. W., Taufik, A., Widodo, M. F. S., & Susmayanti, R. (2024). Menimbang Keadilan: Dinamika Hukum dan Demokrasi Di Persimpangan Zaman. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Muhtar, M. H., Maranjaya, A. K., Arfiani, N., & Rahim, E. (2023). TEORI & HUKUM KONSTITUSI: Dasar Pengetahuan dan Pemahaman serta Wawasan Pemberlakuan Hukum Konstitusi di Indonesia. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=t2HlEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA76&dq=Teori+%26+hukum+konstitusi:+Dasar+pengetahuan+dan+pemahaman+serta+wawasan+pemberlakuan+hukum+konstitusi+di+Indonesia&ots=otVCjoSUme&sig=WBp8tb0XvapUt2KIfKS80OJGtsE
Muhtar, M. H., Tribakti, I., Salim, A., Tuhumury, H. A., Ubaidillah, M. H., Imran, S. Y., Laka, I., Saragih, G. M., Iping, B., & Amin, F. (2023). Konsep Hukum Indonesia. Global Eksekutif Teknologi. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamad-Hidayat-Muhtar/publication/370583612_SEJARAH_TATA_HUKUM_INDONESIA/links/64573db95762c95ac378e471/SEJARAH-TATA-HUKUM-INDONESIA.pdf
Pujayanti, L. P. V. A., Nugrahayu, Z. Z., Rahim, E. I., Muhtar, M. H., & Yassine, C. (2024). Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: Bastion of Law Enforcement and Protector of Human Rights in The Reform Era. Jurnal Pamator?: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v17i1.24128
Razak, A., Muhtar, M. H., Rivera, K. M., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). Balancing Civil and Political Rights: Constitutional Court Powers in Indonesia and Austria. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.70717
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Umum. In Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Suhariyanto, D. (2023). Politik Hukum Pemilu. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Suwito, Setiyawan, D., Muhtar, M. H., & Ahmad. (2023). Contemplating the Morality of Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1261–e1261. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1261
Taufiqurrohman, A. A., Muhtar, M. H., Ahmad, A., Kasim, N. M., & Imran, S. Y. (2024). The Role of Islamic Law, Constitution, and Culture in Democracy in the UAE and Indonesia. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(1).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.