Main Article Content

Debora Debora
Haposan Siallagan
Michelle Lukcy Magdelene

Abstract

In implementing P2PL, an agreement is an important tool that binds the legal relations of the parties and evidence of the existence of a transaction. The contents of an agreement cannot be separated from the Appropriateness principle. The P2PL organizer is not responsible for the risk of default. Failure to fulfill the principle of decency in the P2PL agreement results in no justice being realized, because certain parties are harmed. This study discusses the standard contracts in P2PL agreements and the application of the principle of appropriateness in P2PL agreements as an effort to fulfill justice. Based on the research results, the type of contract used in P2PL is a standard contract which tends to show an imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties. The benchmark for the principle of Appropriateness contained in Article 1339 of the Civil Code can be determined from a sense of justice. Adequacy requirements originate from laws and regulations which can be realized by balancing the positions of the parties. In forming laws and regulations, it must be able to accommodate the interests of all parties. If there is a dispute related to the implementation of the agreement, the law enforcer must Appropriateness principle of justice compared to agreements made on the basis of mere freedom of contract. P2PL organizers without collateral clearly do not provide good protection to lenders. The consequence of the unsecured loan system is high interest rates. Billing mechanisms often result in defamation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Debora, D., Siallagan, H. ., & Magdelene, M. L. (2023). Application of the Principle of Appropriateness in a Peer to Peer Lending Contract. Journal of Law Science, 5(3), 114-121. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.iocscience.org/index.php/JLS/article/view/4113
References
Agus, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak (Cetakan Ketujuh), (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.
Agus Yudha Hernoko, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Perjanjian Komersial (Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup, 2010)
Anita, Siti Zulaikha, Khofidlotur Rofiah, & Risa Sari Pertiwi, “Legal Protection of Lenders in the Implementation”of Financial Technology Based on Peer to Peer Lending,” KnE Social Sciences,2019, 1305–1316.”DOI 10.18502/kss. v3i13.4286
Agus Satori, “Perjanjian Baku dan Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Bisnis Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Penerapan dan Implementasinya di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjajaran, vol. 2, no. 2, 2015
Bambang Pratama, Mengenal Kontrak Elektronik, Click-Wrap Agreement Dan Tanda Tangan Elektronik, Artikel Ilmiah Hukum Bisnis Universitas Bina Nusantara, 2017
Benuf, K., Priyono, E. A., Mahmudah, S., Badriyah, S. M., Rahmanda, B., & Soemarmi, “Efektifitas Pengaturan dan Pengawasan Bisnis Financial Technology (Peer to Peer Lending) di Indonesia.” Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(2), 2019, 198-206.
Choudhry, M., The Principles of Banking, (Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2012)
Evi Ariyani. Hukum Perjanjian, (Jogjakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2013)
Hanifah, Rokhmatun. dkk, “Tantangan Hukum Peer To Peer Lending dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Industri Financial Technology,” Pandecta, Vol. 16. no 2. December 2021 Page 195-205 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.25712
Huijbers, Theo, Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1982)
Kartika, Risna, et al, “Analisis P2PL di Indonesia,” Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi 12 no. 2 (Desember, 2019): 75-86. https://doi. org/10.35905/diktum. v11i2.166. \
Makarim, Edmon, “Pengantar Hukum Telematika, Suatu Kompilasi Kajian di dalam Kontrak Elektronik (E-Contract) dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia,” Gloria Juris, Vol.8, No. 1, Januari–April 2008, . 7.
Menski, Werner, Perbandingan Hukum dalam Konsteks Global, Sistem Eropa, Asia dan Afrika, (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2016)
Miru, Ahmadi, Hukum Perjanjian dan Perancangan Perjanjian (Cetakan Kelima), (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013)
M. Yahya Harahap, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. (Bandung: Alumni, 1986)
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cet. 1. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004
Novinna, Veronica, “Perlindungan Konsumen dari Penyebarluasan Data Pribadi oleh Pihak Ketiga: Kasus Fintech Peer”To Peer Lending,” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, Vol. 9 No. 1 Mei 2020, 92-110, doi 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i01. p07
OJK, Sadari, Amati, Ikuti Perkembangan Financial Technology diakses melalui www.sikapiuangmu.ojk.go.id
Pambudi, Rahmat Dwi, “Perkembangan Fintech di Kalangan Mahasiswa UIN Walisongo,” Harmony 4, no. 2 (November, 2019): 74-81. https://journal. unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/harmony.
Prasetyo, Banu dan Umi Trisyanti,” Revolusi Industri dan Tantangan Perubahan Sosial, Jurnal Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember,”, Prosiding SEMATEKOS, Vol. 3, no. 5, 2018, 26
Riduan Syahrani, Kata-Kata Kunci Mempelajari Ilmu Hukum, (Bandung : PT. Alumni, 2009)
Rahmayani, N, “Tinjauan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Terkait Pengawasan Perusahaan Berbasis Financial Technology di Indonesia.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 2(1), 2018, 24–41.
Ratna Hartanto dan Juliyani Purnama Ramli, “Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Peer to Peer Lending,.
Rendy Saputra, Kedudukan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (MISBRUIK VAN OMSTANDIGHEDEN) Daalm Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2016), 63
Rokhmatun Hanifah. dkk, “Tantangan Hukum Peer To Peer Lending dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Industri Financial Technology,” Pandecta, Vol. 16. no 2. December 2021 Page 195-205 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.25712
Risna Kartika, et al, “Analisis P2PL di Indonesia,” Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi 12 no. 2 (Desember, 2019) : 75-86. https://doi. org/10.35905/diktum. v11i2.166.
Sulistyarini, Rachmi , Makna Asas Kebebasan Berperjanjian Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Menurut Hukum Indonesia, (Ringkasan Desertasi),(2018), Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya, Malang
Soekanto, Soerjono, Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010)
Taryana Soenandar, Prinsip-prinsip UNIDROIT Sebagai Sumber Hukum Kontrak dan Peneyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Internasional, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006), 117
U Yunus, “A Comparison Peer to Peer Lending Platforms in Singapore and Indonesia.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1235/1/012008. p.1
Wahyuni, R. A. E., & Turisno, B. E., “Praktik Finansial Teknologi Ilegal dalam Bentuk Pinjaman Online Ditinjau Dari Etika Bisnis. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 2019, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.14710/ jphi. v1i3.379-391
Windy Sonya Novita dan Moch. Najib Imanullah, “Aspek Hukum Peer to Peer lending (Identifikasi Permasalahan Hukum dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian),” Jurnal Privat Law Vol. VIII No. 1 Januari-Juni 2020, ISSN 2337-4640 (Printed) 2715-5676 (Online)
Yorisca, "Tantangan Global Saat Ini: Mengahadapi Peers to Peers Lending Dengan Know Your Customer Principles Dalam Praktek Perbankan," Legislasi Indonesia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 259-271, 2021.