Main Article Content

Aries Shandy Pasca Ginting

Abstract

The decision immediately (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) is a breakthrough against the slow judicial process. Through the uitvoerbaar bij voorraad institution, the Court's decision can be executed even though the decision has not yet obtained permanent legal force. However, this uitvoerbaar bij voorraad turned out to cause many problems in its implementation practice. One of the problems that often occurs is the process of executing decisions immediately. The District Court as the spearhead of executing the decision immediately (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) often encounters obstacles in executing the decision. Normative research is conducted by examining laws and regulations, legal materials, and other materials related to the writing of this thesis. Sociological research was conducted by conducting research at the Kabanjahe District Court. The types of data used are primary data and secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.The existence of a guarantee by the applicant for execution is one of the conditions for the immediate execution of the decision. Without this guarantee, the execution of the decision cannot be carried out immediately. Barriers to the immediate execution of the decision (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) at the Kabanjahe District Court were not the immediate issuance of an execution permit by the Head of the Medan High Court, the applicant for execution was unable to submit guarantees, and obstacles in the field in the form of mass mobilization by the Respondent for execution. If the execution of the decision is immediately delayed (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad), the District Court of Kabanjahe takes measures to overcome the delay in execution. In the event that the execution of the decision is immediately hampered because the chairman of the Medan High Court has not issued an execution permit immediately, then the only way to implement the contents of the decision is to wait until the decision has permanent legal force. If the execution delay is due to the inability of the execution applicant to provide guarantees, then the Chief of the Kabanjahe District Court will advise the execution applicant to borrow money from family or relatives, friends, or the bank. In the event that the execution is delayed due to obstacles in the field, the Court bailiff and the police will take persuasive efforts. the Head of the Kabanjahe District Court will advise the execution applicant to borrow money from family or relatives, friends, or the bank. In the event that the execution is delayed due to obstacles in the field, the Court bailiff and the police will take persuasive efforts. the Head of the Kabanjahe District Court will advise the execution applicant to borrow money from family or relatives, friends, or the bank. In the event that the execution is delayed due to obstacles in the field, the Court bailiff and the police will take persuasive efforts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ginting, A. S. P. (2020). An Overview Of The Immediate Execution Of Amar Decisions (Uitvoebaar Bij Voorad ) In Civil Cases in The Kabanjahe State Court. Journal of Law Science, 2(3), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v2i3.1626
References
Dja'is, Mochammad. 2004. Basic Thoughts on Execution Law. Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University: Semarang.
Hermansyah. 2009. Diktat of Civil Procedure Law Lectures. Faculty of Law, University of North Sumatra: Medan.
Please, M. Yahya. 2006. Scope of Execution Issues in the Civil Sector. Sinar Graphic: Jakarta.
2005. Civil Procedure Law. Sinar Graphic: Jakarta. Kansil, CST 1992. Introduction to Law. Library Center: Jakarta.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2002. Indonesian Civil Procedure Code. Liberty: Yogyakarta.
. 1999. Knowing the Law (An Introduction). Liberty: Yogyakarta.
Mulyadi, Lilik. 1999. Civil Procedure Law according to the Theory and Practice of the Indonesian Judiciary. Bridge: Jakarta.
. 1997. Provisionil Claims in Civil Procedure Law in Judicial Practice. Bridge: Jakarta.
Muttaqien, Dadan. 2006. Basic Civil Procedure Law. Insania Cita Press: Yogyakarta.
Nasir, M. 2003. Civil Procedure Law. Bridge: Jakarta.
Print, Darwan. 1996. Strategies for Developing and Handling Civil Lawsuits. Image of Aditya Bakti: Bandung.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2006. Legal Studies. Image of Aditya Bakti: Bandung. Rasaid, M. Nur. 1999. Civil Procedure Law. Sinar Graphic: Jakarta.
lucky. 2004. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Pustaka Bangsa Press: Medan. Saifullah, 2007. Reflections on Sociology of Law. Refika Aditama: Bandung.
Saleh, K. Wantjik. 1981. Civil Procedure Code Rbg / HIR. Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.
Sayuthi, Wildan. 2004. Seizures and Executions: Court Justice Practices.
Simorangkir JCT & Rudy T. Erwin. 2009. Legal Dictionary. Sinar Graphic: Jakarta.
Soeparmono, R. 2005. Civil Procedure Law and Jurisprudence. Mandar Maju: Bandung.
Soeroso, R. 2009. Practice of Civil Procedure Law: Procedures and Court Process. Sinar Graphic: Jakarta.
Subekti, R. & Tjitrosoedibio. 2008. Legal Dictionary. Pradnya Paramita: Jakarta. Subekti, R. 2008. Law of Evidence. Pradnya Paramita: Jakarta.
.1997. Civil Procedure Law, Bina Cipta: Bandung. Sudarsono, 2007. Legal Dictionary (New Edition). Asdi Mahasatya: Jakarta.
Sutantio, Retnowulan. 1997. Civil Procedure Law in Theory and Practice.
Mandar Maju: Bandung.
Syahrani, Riduan. 2004. Book of Basic Materials for Civil Procedure Law. Image of Aditya Bakti: Bandung
.1988. Civil Procedure Law in General Courts.
Kartini Library: Jakarta.
Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court
Law Number 49 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 2 of 1986 concerning General Courts
Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.
Law No. 5 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court.
Law No. 8 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 2 of 1986 concerning General Courts.
Law Number 2 of 1986 concerning General Courts. Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court. Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2001.
Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 3 of 2000 dated July 21, 2000.
Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 3 of 1978 dated April 1, 1978.
Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 6 of 1975 dated December 1, 1975.
Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 3 of 1971 dated May 17, 1971.
Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 5 of 1969 dated June 2, 1969.
Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Circular No. 13 of 1964 dated July 10, 1964.
RI Supreme Court. 2004. Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties and Administration of Courts Book II (5th printing). Jakarta: The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
RI Supreme Court. 2003. Anthology of Civil Procedure Law. Jakarta: The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Research and Development Center for Education and Training of the Supreme Court – RI. 1997. Decisions That Can Be Implemented In Advance. Jakarta: The Judicial Technical Development Project for the Supreme Court – RI.